Oct
10
DOJ Sets Up New Website of Consumers in Regards to Agents….
Posted by mattratcliffe under For Realty Professionals
DOJ Sets Up New Website of Consumers in Regards to Agents….
Here we go again, someone wants to get in our business one more time and now it is our Government. If you do not believe me then this site should convince you that the Department of Justice is now on track to inform real estate consumers of all about the truth about our business. Lets see, Phone Companies, Electric Companies, Farm Subsidies and not to mention trying to tax the Internet, we are now being put to the bright light.
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/real_estate/index.htm
Here is a quote from Inman News:
Article can be found at: http://www.inman.com/hstory.aspx?ID=64857
“Both the DOJ and FTC have engaged in actions targeting Realtor-backed state measures that restrict rebates or mandate minimum levels of service for real estate licensees, for example, and the FTC last year took action against a group of MLSs that placed restrictions on the online dissemination of property information based on the type of listing contract chosen by the sellers.
The estimated median commission paid by home sellers in 2006 was $11,672, and that amount has risen every year since it was $9,110 in 2001, according to the DOJ site.
“Unless broker costs were also rising sharply during this period of time, competition among brokers should also have held commissions in check even as home prices were rising,” according to the Web site. Real estate commission rates are typically a percentage of the home’s selling price.
“Over the past decade the average commission rate has remained relatively steady between 5 and 5.5 percent,” the Web site states. “As a result, the actual median commission paid by consumers rose sharply along with the run-up in home prices.”
In 2007, the median commission paid by consumers dropped to $11,302 from the 2006 level, while the median sales price of homes dropped from $230,059 in 2005 to $225,334 in 2006 and dropped to $218,184 in the first half of 2007.
According to the preliminary results of an annual profile of home buyers and sellers prepared by the National Association of Realtors, 70 percent of sellers say they negotiated their real estate commissions, Salvant said, adding that in 39 percent of cases the agent brought up the negotiability of commissions while in 31 percent of the cases the seller brought it up.
A map at the DOJ site lists 13 states that forbid buyers’ brokers from rebating a portion of the sales commission to consumers, and a separate map displays eight states that require consumers “to buy more services form sellers’ brokers than they may want, with no option to waive the extra items,” according to text at the site.
The list of states with anti-rebate measures includes: Alaska, Oregon, Montana, North Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama and New Jersey. The list of states with so-called minimum-service measures includes: Idaho, Utah, Texas, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana and Alabama — Iowa, Missouri and Alabama appear on both lists.
A chart at the site compares the cost of full-service real estate companies that charge about a 5 percent commission to alternative business models that offer a buyer’s broker rebate and/or offer a fee-for-service model.
“Consumers who live in states permitting them the option to choose innovative brokerage options, such as rebates or fee-for-service MLS-only packages, can potentially save thousands of dollars on commission payments,” the Web site states.
The Web site notes that closing costs related to real estate transactions “are another area where robust competition is needed to protect consumers,” and the DOJ’s Antitrust Division “advises states to reject laws that prohibit nonlawyers from providing real estate closing services” to preserve competition between lawyers and nonlawyers.
Additional resources at the Web site include links to reports and hearings on the topic of real estate competition in the brokerage industry, as well as a list of DOJ enforcement actions.”
I guess the part the website fails to mention as our commission went up because of the sales price so did the expense of making that commission. The last time I checked we paid the same amount at the gas pump as every other American. They are not trying to tell the Oil business that they are making to much money or showing consumers a fancy website that shows their income. We pay taxes just like everyone else and we get double taxed at the local level because we use our vehicles for our business. I guess you can tell that I’m a little put out that the very country that cries free enterprise chooses to tell the American buyer and seller that we make to much money. Did I mention that as independent contractors we find nearly impossible to get health Insurance and we have to pay nearly double because of it. I could rant all night about this one, however I will just leave it where it is for now.
Matt Ratcliffe





Comments (0)